Previous posts have focused on Foreign Corrupt Practices Act enforcement actions concerning conduct (in whole or in part) in Thailand, Vietnam, Indonesia, and Malaysia.
This post takes a look at FCPA enforcement actions involving conduct (in whole or in part) in other Southeast Asian countries: the Philippines, Laos, and Myanmar.
Philippines
In 2024, the DOJ criminal charges against various individuals (including Smartmatic executives) concerning an alleged bribery and money laundering scheme “to retain and obtain business related to the 2016 Philippine elections. […] These bribes were allegedly paid to obtain and retain business related to providing voting machines and election services for the 2016 Philippine elections and to secure payments on the contracts, including the release of value added tax payments.” In 2025, Smartmatic was also criminally charged in connection with the same core conduct. Smartmatic, as well as the executives, are contesting the charges and the enforcement action remains pending.
This post highlights five FCPA enforcement actions (ranging from the largest FCPA settlement of all-time to one of the first FCPA enforcement actions in 1978) concerning conduct (in whole or in part) in Malaysia.
The enforcement action (the largest FCPA settlement in history) concerned bribes to various Malaysian and Abu Dhabi officials in connection with 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB), Malaysia’s state-owned and state-controlled investment development company.
The same core conduct was also at issue in the 2018 FCPA enforcement action against Low Taek Jho (Jho Low), Ng Chong Hwa (Roger Ng – a former managing director at Goldman Sachs), and Tim Leissner (the former Southeast Asia Chairman at Goldman Sachs and Participating Manager Director). Leissner pleaded guilty and was sentenced in 2025 to 2 years in prison . In 2022, Ng was found guilty at trial of FCPA and related offenses and was sentenced to 10 years in prison. Jho Low remains a fugitive.
This post highlights the twenty-five FCPA enforcement actions concerning conduct (in whole or in part) in Indonesia.
The enforcement action concerned conduct in South Africa and Indonesia.
As to Indonesia, the allegations were: “Between approximately 2015 and 2018, SAP, through its agents, including but not limited to SAP Indonesia and its personnel, engaged in a scheme to bribe Indonesian officials, to obtain improper business advantages for SAP in connection with various contracts between and among SAP and Indonesian departments, agencies, and instrumentalities.”
Set forth below are the general details of fifteen FCPA enforcement actions (all since 2008) which have involved (in whole or in part) conduct in Vietnam.
The enforcement action concerned conduct in China, India, Indonesia, United Arab Emirates, and Vietnam.
As to Vietnam, the allegations stated that: “Albemarle corruptly obtained contracts at two state-owned oil refineries in Vietnam through the use of an intermediary sales agent who requested increased commissions to pay bribes to PetroVietnam and refinery officials and to structure tender requirements to favor Albemarle. […] In 2016, Albemarle also used Vietnam Intermediary Company and its connections to PetroVietnam officials to corruptly obtain business at another state-owned refinery in Vietnam, Nghi Son Refinery and Petrochemicals LLC (“NSRP”). NSRP was owned by a joint venture that included, among others, PetroVietnam and Kuwait Petroleum International, also a state-owned entity.”
This post highlights FCPA enforcement actions concerning conduct (in whole or in part) in Thailand.
Since 2004, there have been fourteen FCPA enforcement actions concerning conduct (in whole or in part) in Thailand.
The enforcement action concerned conduct in Thailand based on the conduct of a subsidiary in Thailand and largely focused on Thai officials visiting massage parlors and participating in non-business travel funded by the subsidiary.