<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will The SEC Be Put To Its Burden Of Proof In The Jackson And Ruehlen Enforcement Action?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fcpaprofessor.com/will-the-sec-be-put-to-its-burden-of-proof-in-the-jackson-and-ruehlen-enforcement-action/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fcpaprofessor.com/will-the-sec-be-put-to-its-burden-of-proof-in-the-jackson-and-ruehlen-enforcement-action</link>
	<description>A Forum Devoted to the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 10:47:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard Sklar</title>
		<link>http://www.fcpaprofessor.com/will-the-sec-be-put-to-its-burden-of-proof-in-the-jackson-and-ruehlen-enforcement-action#comment-17346</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard Sklar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fcpaprofessor.com/?p=3915#comment-17346</guid>
		<description>Good points all, Mike.

With Joe and David as defense counsel, this could get interesting in a hurry for the SEC, and not in a good way.  They&#039;re both extraordinary lawyers with significant experience.

And the defendants don&#039;t face the same disincentives to take the case to trial as they would in a criminal case.

Plus, I wonder if they&#039;re going to school on the recent acquittals/hung juries.  How do those cases change the calculus for defendants?

This is somewhat similar, in my mind, to the Africa Sting case.  Juries hate stings, and they&#039;re going to hate forced bribes to Nigerian customs.  What they&#039;re not going to like, however, is the seniority of the defendants.  If these were lower-level employees, I&#039;d say almost certain acquittal.  But these two...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points all, Mike.</p>
<p>With Joe and David as defense counsel, this could get interesting in a hurry for the SEC, and not in a good way.  They&#8217;re both extraordinary lawyers with significant experience.</p>
<p>And the defendants don&#8217;t face the same disincentives to take the case to trial as they would in a criminal case.</p>
<p>Plus, I wonder if they&#8217;re going to school on the recent acquittals/hung juries.  How do those cases change the calculus for defendants?</p>
<p>This is somewhat similar, in my mind, to the Africa Sting case.  Juries hate stings, and they&#8217;re going to hate forced bribes to Nigerian customs.  What they&#8217;re not going to like, however, is the seniority of the defendants.  If these were lower-level employees, I&#8217;d say almost certain acquittal.  But these two&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
