Comments on: Judge (Again) Significantly Rejects DOJ’s Recommendation In Sentencing Leo Winston Smith http://www.fcpaprofessor.com/judge-again-significantly-rejects-dojs-recommendation-in-sentencing-leo-winston-smith A Forum Devoted to the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Wed, 01 May 2013 10:47:49 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2 By: Mike Koehler http://www.fcpaprofessor.com/judge-again-significantly-rejects-dojs-recommendation-in-sentencing-leo-winston-smith#comment-159 Mike Koehler Sat, 08 Jan 2011 02:16:25 +0000 http://fcpaprofessor.com/judge-again-significantly-rejects-dojs-recommendation-in-sentencing-leo-winston-smith#comment-159 I have read the above docket entry. I am not sure what your point is, please feel free to share so that others can benefit from your viewpoint. I have read the above docket entry. I am not sure what your point is, please feel free to share so that others can benefit from your viewpoint.

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.fcpaprofessor.com/judge-again-significantly-rejects-dojs-recommendation-in-sentencing-leo-winston-smith#comment-158 Anonymous Sat, 08 Jan 2011 01:05:16 +0000 http://fcpaprofessor.com/judge-again-significantly-rejects-dojs-recommendation-in-sentencing-leo-winston-smith#comment-158 Case No. SA CR 07-69-AG<br />DEFENDANT LEE SMITH’S<br />RESPONSE AND OPPOSITION TO<br />THE GOVERNMENT’S RESPONSE<br />TO THE PRESENTENCE REPORT<br />FOR DEFENDANT LEOWINSTON<br />SMITH [DOCKET NO. 95]<br />Date: March 18, 2010<br /><br /><br />Read the above and then decide for your self Case No. SA CR 07-69-AGDEFENDANT LEE SMITH’SRESPONSE AND OPPOSITION TOTHE GOVERNMENT’S RESPONSETO THE PRESENTENCE REPORTFOR DEFENDANT LEOWINSTONSMITH [DOCKET NO. 95]Date: March 18, 2010Read the above and then decide for your self

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.fcpaprofessor.com/judge-again-significantly-rejects-dojs-recommendation-in-sentencing-leo-winston-smith#comment-157 Anonymous Fri, 07 Jan 2011 20:49:31 +0000 http://fcpaprofessor.com/judge-again-significantly-rejects-dojs-recommendation-in-sentencing-leo-winston-smith#comment-157 To begin with, none of them were guilty of the rumers alledged against them by the companies former CFO and COO.<br />What an absolute injustice against some very fine persons To begin with, none of them were guilty of the rumers alledged against them by the companies former CFO and COO.What an absolute injustice against some very fine persons

]]>